Dear
Rev. Know it all,
Can
you explain papal inscrutability?
Yours,
Betty
Kencownzell
Dear
Betty,
I
think you mean papal infallibility, and of course I can explain it. Have you
forgotten to whom you are writing?
The
Oxford dictionary defines “infallible” as incapable of
making mistakes
or being wrong.
Papal infallibility means that the Pope is never wrong when he speaks a) in the exercise of his office as shepherd and
teacher of all Christians, b) in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, and
c) when he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the
whole Church.
When the pope, successor of St. Peter as Bishop of
Rome, speaks “in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all
Christians”, he is said to speak “ex cathedra.”
A “cathedra” was a straight backed chair, or throne. A cathedral is, thus,
where the teaching chair of the bishop is kept. The “cathedra” in question is
the teaching chair of St. Peter. There is an ancient chair kept at St. Peter’s
in Rome, enshrined in the great bronze throne behind the main altar. It was thought to be the chair from which St.
Peter taught. It was probably a gift from Emperor Charles
the Bald to Pope
John VIII in 875. Still, it’s a nice thought.
The
reason much ado is made about a chair, is that at least at the time of Christ,
rabbis taught while sitting in a teaching chair. When Jesus went up the
mountain with His disciples to deliver His famous sermon on the mount, He sat
down to do it. “Now when Jesus saw the crowds, he went up on a mountainside and sat
down. His disciples came to him, and opening his mouth he taught them.” (Matt
5:1) If a rabbi had something important to say, he said it sitting down; hence
he spoke “ex cathedra” or “from the
chair.”
There
is a swell book, a real page-turner by, a German theologian, Heinrich Denzinger
(1819-1893) called the Enchiridion Symbolorum et Definitionum. It contains
the chief decrees and definitions of all church councils, along with the oldest
forms of the Apostles' Creed and a list of
condemned propositions. The first edition has just 128 documents. The latest
editions have included the teachings of the Second Vatican Council and recent Popes,
so if you want to know what some doctrine means, get what, in seminary, we
fondly called “a Denzinger.” Here is
what Denzinger has to say about infallibility.
“What is
claimed for the pope is infallibility merely, not
impeccability or inspiration” and that
to speak infallibly “The pontiff must
teach in his public and official capacity as pastor
and doctor of all Christians, not merely in his private
capacity as a theologian, preacher or allocutionist,
nor in his capacity as a temporal prince or as a mere ordinary of the Diocese
of Rome. It must be clear that he speaks
as spiritual head of the Church
universal.”
Denzinger
has a lot more to say about infallibility, but why be tedious in a church
bulletin? What people don’t understand about the teaching of papal
infallibility taught by the first Vatican Council (1869-70) is that it limits
the pope’s authority.
There
have been some really wild and wacky things popes have said over the years. For
instance, according to Pope Gregory VII (1073-1085) “All princes should kiss
the feet of the pope alone…” and “that it is lawful for him to depose emperors
…” and in 1302 Pope Boniface VIII said in the papal bull Unam Sanctam,
“Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely
necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman
Pontiff. And how about the unpleasantness with Galileo? Didn’t the church
infallibly declare that the earth was the center of the solar system? No, what Cardinal Bellarmine, a really nice
guy, said was that “treating heliocentrism as a real phenomenon would be a very
dangerous thing, irritating philosophers and theologians, and harming the Holy
Faith by rendering Holy Scripture as false.”
The Cardinal was thinking about the wars of religion north of the Alps
in which Protestants and Catholics were killing each other in the millions and
he thought, “We don’t need that down here right now.” The problem was that Galileo was directly
saying that the Bible was wrong, and in so doing he was laying the groundwork
for a social upheaval that was dangerous. If Galileo had said it differently,
there wouldn’t
have been a problem.
In
fact Galileo was wrong. His theory didn’t fit the number. The planets don’t
travel; around the sun in circles as he claimed — they travel in ellipses. Why
get thousands killed over a theory that didn’t work mathematically. Galileo
declared himself far more infallible than any pope. The Church is not capable
of speaking infallibly about science. Neither are scientists and that was the
point!
As
for the statements of Boniface and Gregory, they were political in nature, and
thus couldn’t be called infallible. That is why there is not a lot of foot
kissing going on in the Vatican these days.
(By the way “papal bull” refers to the Latin word “bulla” or “seal” in English by which the pope applies his personal
seal to the letter to guarantee its authenticity. Don’t get any silly ideas.)
So you see, the First Vatican Council reminded popes that they were not
infallible when they spoke about politics, cosmology, ecology, and most other
-ologies. They were infallible only when they spoke about faith and morals, and
it has to be clear that they are doing so. Furthermore, the pope has
infallibility, not impeccability or inspiration. Lack of impeccability means
that he can sin and the lack of inspiration means that he cannot come up with
new doctrine. He can only illuminate and declare what the Church has always
held and believed. We Catholics are not Mormons. We have no chief “Prophet, Seer, or Revelator, “as do the Mormons. The “Prophet, Seer, and
Revelator” is the title of the supreme Mormon authority. A Mormon
revelator “makes known, with the Lord’s help, something before unknown. It may
be new or forgotten truth, or a new or forgotten application of known truth to
man’s need.”
Before
1978, anyone with African ancestry could not be priest in the Mormon Church,
and could not participate in most temple ordinances, including celestial
marriage. That meant that they could not go to the highest
heaven. But, Glory Be! In 1978, the prophet seer and revelator said that God
had changed His mind and now blacks would be allowed into the highest
heaven. A pope could only dream about
such infallibility. Our poor pontiff is stuck with what we have held and taught
from the beginning, things like marriage being a relationship between a man and
a woman since Jesus said that, “For this reason a man will leave his father and
mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh” (Matt.
19.5)
For
Catholics, Scripture and Sacred Tradition are the only sources of revelation.
The magisterium (teaching authority of the Church) is not a source of
revelation. It can only bring forward and restate what we have believed from
the first. The last words my boyhood pastor said to me were “Keep that faith
handed down to us from the apostles Peter and Paul.”
Lord knows I’m trying, Monsignor O’Brien, Lord
knows I’m trying.
Rev.
Know-it-all
Well that is as clear as the river after a heavy rain! It sounds like it is a council of men that tells the Pope he is infallible when it comes to faith and morals.Is that what happened with Annas or Calaphas? Were they not infallible too? They had a council of men too. What about including Gods opinion by praying?
ReplyDeleteJesus Christ is the only leader of our Church that is infallible and without sin. He asks for unity. We, knowing of our sinful nature should be obedient to Him. That equals one church the Catholic Church regardless if we think our human interpretation outranks The Lord. The Lord never leads us away from His Church but someone masquerading as an angel of light would.
Knowing our sinful nature and weakness of human error we should all agree to follow Jesus Christ our Lord who gave the keys to Peter the first Pope of His church known today as the Catholic Church.
Infallibility is different from impeccability. God protects the official doctrine of the Church from error. He likewise prevents those who have the power to officially pronounce doctrine from doing so in error. If the Way, the Truth, and the Life are One, we need somebody to point to Him without error when others try to confuse the issue.
ReplyDeleteI have a more thorough explanation of the logic which requires doctrinal infallibility.
Papal infallibility can be deduced. Since we know that the Church *will* batter down the gates of Hell someday, we know that the Church cannot make a serious mistake that would derail this event. We know this by deduction, because we *know* what the Church will be doing on that day. Therefore, no matter how stupid an action a pope may commit, we know it will result in the destruction of Hell. It's simple deductive reasoning.
ReplyDelete