Dear
Rev. Know-it-all,
The
Christian religion is so primitive. This myth of the dying and rising god
permeates ancient religions and is only symbolic. Science has proven that dead
bodies cannot be brought back to life. I celebrate Easter because it is a
beautiful celebration of the power of nature, a celebration of the Goddess in
all her power and splendor. Perhaps there is some kind of survival of death, or
cosmic consciousness, but resurrection? Really! To believe in an impossibility
without a shred of evidence is the height of gullibility. You traditional
Catholics make this beautiful spring festival of life and fertility more like
something from a Frankenstein movie.
Yours
faithlessly,
Dr.
Agnes Tick
Professor of Feminist Studies
Bathsheba Bible College
Professor of Feminist Studies
Bathsheba Bible College
Dear
Dr. Tick,
I
would venture that there are shreds of evidence, like a group of men and women,
many of whom died violent deaths refusing to deny that they had seen Jesus of
Nazareth risen from the dead. Their testimony transformed the world. There are
still events that don’t conform to the laws of science, such as Fatima and
Lourdes and Zeitoun. There is also the nearness of the Lord available to
believers, but I don’t expect you to accept any of these. To do so, you must
rely on the witness of others. Still, there is something that one can actually
touch and see and examine under a microscope: the Shroud of Turin. I can here
you laughing all the way from your tenured teaching chair. After all, wasn’t
the Shroud proven a fake by carbon dating in 1988? Herein lies the problem with
tenure in institutions of higher learning. Once a person is in for life, he (or
she) need never have a new idea — intellectual curiosity becomes optional. The
pope should be so infallible!
Let
me tell you the latest. Dr. Ray Rogers of Los Alamos National Laboratory was
the head of chemistry experiments for the Shroud of Turin Research Project that
performed scientific tests of the shroud in 1978. When carbon dating put the
origin of the Shroud at around 1300 AD, he gave up on the Shroud. The case was
closed. Science had spoken. When some tried to explain why the carbon dating
was wrong, Dr. Rogers became angry at these nut-cases who couldn’t accept the
verdict of hard science. He was particularly angry at Joseph Marino and his
wife Sue Benford. In the year 2000 they claimed that there had been a repair
attempt in the area of the Shroud from which the testing samples had been
taken. They concluded that the Carbon 14 tests were done on a medieval patch,
not on the actual Shroud. Dr. Rogers knew he could prove them wrong. He
actually had small pieces of the Shroud from the test area. He examined his
samples and was thunderstruck by what he saw. A couple of non-academics had
been right.
The
cloth examined by some of the world’s most prestigious laboratories was made of
cotton. The Shroud is made of linen. Dr. Rogers could actually see where the
linen and cotton threads had been spliced together and dyed to match the rest
of the Shroud. He submitted his work to review by fellow chemists. His article
in the scientific journal Thermochimica
Acta (Jan. 20, 2005) is the one of the few peer reviewed articles on the
subject. In 2008, at Dr. Rogers’ request, a team of nine scientists at the Los
Alamos National Laboratory headed by Dr. Robert Villarreal proved the carbon
dating invalid. Villarreal wrote, “The age-dating process failed to recognize
one of the first rules of analytical chemistry that any sample taken for
characterization of an area… must… be representative of the whole."
"The
part must be representative of the whole. Our analyses of the three thread
samples taken from the Raes and C-14 sampling corner showed that this was not
the case.” This means the Shroud of Turin has never been carbon dated. However,
there is another way to date ancient cloths. Vanillin is produced by the
decomposition of lignin, a component of flax, from which linen is made. It’s
found in medieval linens but not in older cloths. It vanishes with time. First
century linen cloths don’t contain vanillin because they are too old. Medieval
linens contain some vanillin and modern linen has a lot of vanillin. Dr.
Rogers’ paper concludes that, based on vanillin loss, that the Shroud is
between 1,300 and 3,000 years old, old enough to have wrapped the crucified
Christ. Well fine, you may say. So the cloth is old. What proves that it’s the
burial cloth of Jesus? Where’s your evidence?
First,
let me review what the Shroud of Turin is, in case you have been hiding under
an ivy covered rock at Bathsheba Bible College.
The
Shroud of Turin is a fourteen foot long cloth that has the faint image of a man
imprinted on it. The image is not painted, but formed by a sort of scorch,
perhaps a radiation burn, of only top threads of the top fibers of the cloth.
There are human blood stains on the cloth, but the image is so limited to the
threads that where there is a bloodstain, there is no image on the underlying
cloth. This means that the image was formed after the bloodstains had been
made. There is a faint, pale brown image of a man, five-foot eleven inches
tall, who appears to have Jewish style payes (side locks). He has wounds in his
hands, side and feet, and small puncture wounds around the scalp, small double
wounds all over his body and a side wound the size of a typical roman lance.
The small wounds all over the body are the exact size of the tips of an ancient
Roma whip, a flagrum. The wounds are consistent with a Jewish man whipped by
Romans, crowned with thorns, crucified and pierced with a lance.
It
is clearly an image of Jesus, the only man we know of who was whipped and
crucified, but also crowned with thorns and pierced by a lance. These last two
were not part of a typical Roman crucifixion.
You
may say, “So it’s Jesus. Big deal. It doesn’t prove a thing. There is nothing
supernatural or even unusual about any of this. There are untold thousands of
such images in churches everywhere.” Well, what convinces me is what is not
seen. For centuries the Shroud attracted no scientific interest until 1898.
Secondo Pia, an Italian photographer, was allowed to photograph the cloth. When
he developed the photographic negatives he was shaken. On the cloth was a faint
image. Impossibly, the negative was a perfect photograph. That started the
scientific investigation of the cloth that has never stopped.
In
the 1960’s Peter Schumacher developed the VP-8 image analyzer for creating
relief maps of distant objects such as the Moon and Mars. In 1976, Schumacher
had just finished installing a VP-8 Image analyzer for Dr. John Jackson of the
Sandia Scientific Laboratories. Jackson placed an image of the Shroud of Turin
in the analyzer. When it was activated, a three-dimensional image appeared.
Schumacher says “I had no idea what I was looking at. (He had never heard of
the Shroud.) However, the results were unlike anything I have processed through
the VP-8 Analyzer, before or since. Only the Shroud of Turin has produced these
results from a VP-8 Image Analyzer.”
Wait,
there’s more! Dr. Joseph Kohlbeck, of the Hercules Aerospace Center in Salt
Lake, Utah, and Dr. Richard Levi-Setti of the Enrico Fermi Institute at the
University of Chicago, have examined particles taken from the Shroud’s surface.
They found travertine aragonite, from near the Damascus Gate in Jerusalem. The
chemical signatures of the Shroud samples and the dust found near Golgotha are
identical. This particular kind of limestone dust has been found only near
Jerusalem.
Wait,
there’s more! The bloodstains, which are human blood, have the hidden
characteristics of blood. On the Shroud, there are components such as bile,
bilirubin, heme, and serum, unknown to medieval medicine. These marks were made
after death, and are invisible to the naked eye. They can be seen only under
ultra-violet light. The blood has a high bilirubin content which means it was
shed under conditions of severe stress. Quite a clever medieval forger to put
all these invisible things on the Shroud in a foolish attempt to dupe us modern
sophisticates.
Wait,
there’s more. Mechthild Fleury-Lemberg, one of the world’s leading textile
experts did conservation on the Shroud and was able to thoroughly examine the
cloth front and back. She discovered a unique nearly invisible seam that she
has found on only one other cloth. That cloth is from the time of Christ and
from Masada, only a few miles from Jerusalem.
Wait,
there’s more! Dr. Peter Soons of Holland noticed another detail of the Shroud.
There is no directionality to the image on the Shroud. The image is the same
from any angle, above or below, from right, left, or front. The image emerges
from the cloth evenly. The Shroud looks like a picture to our eyes but image
analysis shows no directionality to the lights and shadows of the picture. In
every picture, painting or photo, there is a light source that reflects off the
image to the beholder, whether artist or camera. This is not true of the
Shroud. The light is everywhere at once. The Shroud is a holograph! In
Jerusalem there is an amazing exhibit on the Shroud. When you see the 3-D
holograph, you realize that the image is not on the cloth at all. It floats in
space some distance from the cloth. It is one of the most amazing things I have
ever seen.
Wait,
there’s more! Dame Isabel Piczek, a particle physicist, noticed that there is
no distortion in the image on the cloth from the pressure of the body on the
tomb slab, nor are there folds and wrinkles from the cloth. Rather, to quote
her, “There is a strange dividing element, an interface from which the image is
projected up and the image is projected down. The muscles of the body are
absolutely not crushed against the stone of the tomb. The body is hovering
between the two sides of the Shroud…. there is absolutely no gravity. The image
is absolutely undistorted… A heretofore unknown interface…” This interface she
says, “…would have been the result of a, collapsed event horizon, in the center
of which, “…there is something which science knows as a singularity. This is
exactly what started the universe in the Big Bang.” Golly!
Wait,
there’s more. I haven’t room here for the coins minted by Pontius Pilate on the
eyes, (Barry Schwortz, a brilliant photographer disputes this, though he has no
doubt that the Shroud is for real) or for pollen unique to Jerusalem on and on
and on. So the Shroud has hidden photographic and hidden three-dimensionality
in it. It is a hidden holograph and demonstrates the mysteries of quantum
physics, as well as rock dust and pollen that come only from the area of the
tomb of Christ in Jerusalem. It may have coins from the holy Land minted only
at the time of Christ.
I
can hear you say, “Well all this must be just coincidence. After all, the
carbon dating proves….”
Can’t
you get it through your thick tenured head that there was no carbon dating of
the Shroud? JESUS ROSE FROM THE DEAD. The sooner you get used to the fact, the
sooner you’ll come to know Him and accept Him as the Lord of the universe and
the Lord of your life.
Happy
Easter,
Rev.
Know-it-all
Yes Father, Jesus lives, and I have more than one example of hard copy proof. He is our Lord and we His servants. However, can you explain this sentence: "Remember the JOY of The Resurrection". If you could detail thoroughly the "joy", please do! Thank you.
ReplyDeletegod Bless you and thank you Father!
ReplyDelete